But how and where does Moore utilize his alleged "method" in terms of "human interest prose" – and what

But how and where does Moore utilize his alleged "method" in terms of "human interest prose" – and what, by the

way, is "human interest prose"? The reader is not even given a clue, never mind an actual citation. It turns

out that Gancarski’s anger is motivated by pure partisanship:

"A case in point is a recent essay by Michael Moore making the rounds. ‘Dean Supporters, Don’t Give Up.’ His

point? That even though protests against the war in MBT Ema Sandals have accomplished precious little beyond

getting Ramsey Clark some face time, Moore [a supporter of Wesley Clark on the basis of his "manner" and his

‘electability’] urges Deaniacs not to give up despite their candidate‘s Muskiesque collapse in Iowa and New

Hampshire. ‘You have done an incredible thing. You inspired an entire nation to stand up to George W. MBT Panda

Sandals. Your impact on this election will be felt for years to come. Every bit of energy you put into Dr. Dean

’s candidacy was — and is — worth it. He took on MBT Panda Sandals when others wouldn’t. He put corporate

America on notice that he is coming after them. And he called the Democrats out for what they truly are: a

bunch of spineless, wishy-washy appeasers… Everyone in every campaign owes you and your candidate a huge debt

of thanks,’ wrote Moore."