Furthermore, “the property rights of thousands of enterprises are in limbo. In Kiev, rumors abound
that oligarchs connected to the old regime are trying to sell their enterprises to Russian business
executives and are preparing to escape the country. Naturally, executives are cutting off investment,
and economic growth is screeching to a halt. To make matters worse, a new socialist minister of
privatization has been appointed who opposes privatization in principle. She asked recently: ‘What is
so bad about re-nationalization?’ Tymoshenko concurred in a recent newspaper interview: ‘The biggest
enterprises, which can easily be efficiently managed, must not be privatized, and they can give the
state as an owner wonderful profits.’ This sounds like state capitalism.”
State capitalism. Hmmm. Well what should we have expected? As Justin Raimondo said more than three
months ago:
“The Ukrainians believe they can balance their budget by revisiting suspicious privatizations, seizing
assets, and re-selling them to the highest bidder. Yushchenko was sold to Western journalists as well
as his own electorate as a ‘free-market reformer,’ but this is hardly a ‘free market’ approach.
Aside from destroying the sort of stability that business requires, it assumes the good will of
government regulators – not a wise course, in any country – and encourages yet more corruption by making
political pull, rather than entrepreneurial skill, the coin of the realm. Who will be ‘re-privatized,
’ and who will be spared? It’s all up to the gang currently in power.”
No comments:
Post a Comment